DISQUS

rizzn.com: rizzn's personal blog

  • Keith · 1 year ago
    I can understand your frustrations. I can attest to the fierce opposition you spoke of. I do not blame you for choosing to step away. I think the Friendfeed community should place higher value on respecting one another especially when we disagree. FF offers little value outside of intelligent interaction and we should guard this resource carefully.

    One of the ways I've used to control my interactions is creating stub communities via rooms in friendfeed. This has given me an area to share info and opinions in a much more welcoming environment but it doesn't solve the larger issue.

    Thanks for the post and I'm subscribing to your RSS feed to keep up. BTW, what is your twitter if you don't mind me asking?

    twitter.com/tsudo
    friendfeed.com/tsudohnimh

    Farewell Friend
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    I'm Rizzn on most things (including twitter) - and I enjoyed "secret
    conservative cabal" you and I hung out on for quite a while - as you know,
    it prevented me from cancelling my account one weekend, as I mentioned a
    couple weeks ago..
    /mark "rizzn" hopkins - rizzn.com
    associate editor @ mashable.com
    twitter.com/rizzn - 903-253-0143
    --
    Podcast: http://feeds.feedburner.com/MashableConversations
    LinkBlog: http://feeds.feedburner.com/RizznNewsFeed
    --
    "In God We Trust."
  • nicefishfilms · 1 year ago
    Mark,

    From watching your posts, I knew it was only a matter of time until you made this decision. I would think that you would know better than to talk politics in this environment. I've never seen it this heated before. Best bet for politicos- raise the bar, fight on substance not events. You should know by now that most social network sights are left leaning (and there's nothing wrong with this.) Just don't be surprised if the "numbers" aren't in your favor.

    It hurts me to say this but, conservatives have lost this election already. We (yes, I just outed myself) stood by while our leaders did anything, said anything to get elected. We have strong winning principles of self discipline, innovation and believe that small government is the best government. We lose when we try to legislate morality. We fail when we allow Washington to forget that free markets will weed out inefficiency and illegal behaviors. We get our hats handed to us when we forget to remind people that personal integrity matters most.

    It is hard for me to see some of the posts and comments on social sites that only seek to divide. I truly love my country and am proud to be a citizen of these United States of America. To have disagreements regarding politics is our way. Speak your mind but mind your speech. I opt out of playing politics at this time. I'm focused on the mission of humanity.

    Above all, I will remain a firm believer because I know what's right for me. To quote Charles Krauthammer, "I'd rather lose an election than lose my bearings." Many will disagree with my political way but I hope this is the time to find the common ground. We will think and move our way out of any difficult situations- we always have. It will take many viewpoints and perspectives to fix the economic mess we face but please understand that I am counting on people, not politicians, to figure out the solutions.

    Peace to you Mark. I hope to see you around the FriendFeed neighborhood real soon because it just won't be the same without you.

    (Michael Sean Wright)
  • Hutch Carpenter · 1 year ago
    Well Mark, I hope to see you back on FriendFeed after the election. In the meantime, I'm following your tweets.
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    We'll see. People have been really fanatical over Barack Obama. It wasn't like this before the election, but in the early days, the whole group dynamic was very different.

    When politics are talked about online for too long with the same group of people, it always seems to end up like this, and the minority opinion seems to be finally ran out of town on a rail.

    This isn't the first time I've stormed out in a huff from a community when groupthink takes over. I tend to not look back. We'll see if I do the same this time around. I honestly don't know at this point.
  • flowersjustin · 1 year ago
    "The FactCheck.org entry on this is wrong, and so is the MediaMatters bulletin."

    Hey Mark,

    I'm curious where you got this information - I've been looking around for it, but haven't turned over the right stone.

    Thanks,
    Justin
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    FactCheck is wrong might be the wrong way to say it. FactCheck is incomplete, more like it. There are a lot of things allegedly missing from the one referenced by factcheck, including a state seal and serial numbers, and a few other things that escape my memory.

    I haven't read up on this within the last couple months, so a lot of the facts are rusty in my memory. The reason I stopped originally, quite honestly, was that it lead down a trail to white supremacists websites, something I really had no interest in. Now that the story apparently is being given some validation by mainstream sources and not simply a white power conspiracy theory, I felt it might be worth a second look, hence the link.
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    Justin:
    This was the video I originally watched on it that got me looking around a
    couple months ago or so

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA6_k3NtXZs
  • flowersjustin · 1 year ago
    Hey Mark,

    I agree, it was definitely worth a look. Here's what I found:

    First things first - I came to this with an open mind and no expectations.

    I read the factcheck.org article on it. The article seems pretty complete
    to me - and really the only question that can be put to it is whether or not
    they were handed a falsified, or outright false, document.

    I looked at the video too - and although it makes claims of being made by an
    independent (Molotov Mitchel), and the principal interviewee (Philip J.
    Berg, Esq.) says he's a Democrat (claims that attempt to lend some form of
    objectivity to the piece), I have to take a video with a grain of salt when
    it was made by a production company called "Illuminati Pictures" and begins
    with the claim by Jill Stanek (Who is only identified as a "Star
    Congressional Witness") that Obama supported "infanticide."

    I'd love to see that law.

    "On the ballot for today: Infanticide. All opposed? MmmHmm, Looks like
    99. All in favor? ... I see - let the record show that Barack Obama voted
    in favor of infanticide."

    As to the claims about the birth certificate, Philip J. Berg makes claim
    that the document is a fake, but he doesn't really offer any evidence for
    his claim.

    I think politifact.com (quoted in the factcheck article) makes a good point
    about this debate with Occam's razor, "It is possible that Obama conspired
    his way to the precipice of the world's biggest job, involving a vast
    network of people and government agencies over decades of lies. Anything's
    possible. But step back and look at the overwhelming evidence to the
    contrary and your sense of what's reasonable has to take over."

    Also, as you said, the claim is hurt even more by the fact that it is so
    ardently supported by white supremicist websites and organizations. All in
    all, I have to assume that this claim, along with the many claims like this
    in the past (This same accusation has been placed at the feet of McCain,
    Dick Cheney, and Barry Goldwater), is subterfuge to distract voters from the
    very real problems that we as a nation are facing.

    Thanks for the post,
    Justin Flowers
  • friend feeder · 1 year ago
    The solution was a private feed; ff is populated by the Obama thugacracy who shouted down the HRC people, and now the McCain people. I keep quite on such matters, but it amused me that person after person (HRC, Bill, Ferraro) turned out to not be the person they thought they were just because they oppossed Obama. If all the people you used to admire aren't who you thought they were, what does that say about the current one? There is no critical or rational thinking on ff about politics and I am sorry that drove you away; to me it is more like a cocktail party with polite conversations.
  • Mona N. · 1 year ago
    Mark: The political content you fed into FF sure as hell stirred a ton of controversy... and it looks like I missed the most controversial one. It's unfortunate and disheartening the end result is this.

    That said, I've steered clear from political exchanges (as much as possible), since I already felt the judging and negativity during the primaries. Time and time again, it was a no win situation. When I questioned a policy, plan, or quote from O, I was automatically a racist or feminist. If I questioned Hillary, I was an anti-feminist... and here I thought I was just asking questions -- like I would with any candidate.

    For what it's worth, the one political exchange we had was enough for me to clearly see your position. To me, your shares != your stance. It was quite opposite, actually, since I needed and appreciated your shares. You were the only one I am subd to who brought in topics that asked a lot of tough questions, forced me to research, and kicked up my critical thinking skills. So thank you, for enlightening me.

    I'm really glad I got to know you via FriendFeed and let me know when (or if) you DO decide to sign up for another SN service. You already know I love love LOVE your tech shares so you better believe I will be the first to follow you. Until then, I'm looking forward to and relying on you to keep sharing what you've shared on FriendFeed via Google Reader!


    m. :)
  • paulbuchheit · 1 year ago
    Mark,

    It's unfortunate that your FriendFeed experience has become so stressful. I hope you'll be back when the election is over and these political discussions die down.

    For what it's worth, I'm not an Obama fanatic either (I voted for Ron Paul in the primaries). However, I believe that these conspiracy theories are harmful and distract from legitimate concerns and issues. The reason that I mentioned McCain's place of birth is because I've seen people elsewhere on the web making analogous arguments about his not being a natural born citizen, and I find those arguments equally absurd. Both Obama and McCain have enough actual defects that we should not spend any time arguing about the details of their birth. I certainly did not intend for any of my comments to be personally insulting, and I apologize for the misunderstanding if they felt like they were.
  • galtroarc · 1 year ago
    Hi Mark,
    Hope you come back sooner rather than later. You know what, after that discussion, I'm going to quit discussing politics on FF. Let's stick to what we are good at - technology! Come back, and lets get fiercely and unreasonably rigid about Macs vs PCs instead - and lolCats.
  • Jay Tannenbaum · 1 year ago
    Sorry about Berg. He does seem like a litigious loon. That doesn't change the fact that there are still many open questions about Obama. The press has sadly done a poor job of vetting him. Some of the information I would like to see include:

    1. Columbia College records
    2. Columbia Thesis paper
    3. Harvard College records
    4. Illinois State Senate records
    5. Illinois State Senate schedule
    6. Law practice client list and billing records/summary
    7. Locations and names of all half-siblings and step-mothers
    8. Medical records (only the one page summary released so far)
    9. Occidental College records
    10. Parent's Marriage Certificate
    11. Record of baptism
    12. Selective Service Registration
    13. Trips schedules for trips outside of the United States before 2007
    14. Scholarly articles
    15. Campaign donor analysis requested by 7 major watchdog groups

    If he was Palin they would be all over these points. 3 days on her clothing allowance.
  • Jay Tannenbaum · 1 year ago
    I'll miss you in the Oasis. Goodbye, amigo.
  • Zee. · 1 year ago
    Dude, i've grown to think you're pretty cool - don't just ditch a community because a few people tick you off or one/two of your shares caused a bit of controversy. Use the tools available, block, delete, hide, use lists...heck, even privatize your account etc...

    This really is one of the most awesome socnets out there if you make of it what you want. You've made your point, people have taken notice and I have no doubt that all the politics talk will simmer down after these elections are over.

    With regard to your comment - I think you were a lil naive to think that any mention of either Obama or Mccain in whatever context wasn't going to drum up controversy...but hell, that's just my opinion.

    All I'm really saying is hold out, don't delete your account (which can do here if you have to https://friendfeed.com/account/delete) and hold out until after the elections. Even spend a bit more customizing your feed and see how things go...

    Anyway - those are my thoughts - either way stay in touch. I've just added you to my twitter facebook.com/wedocreative.com .
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    I don't mind controversy, and I agree that FriendFeed is technically pretty cool.

    There's a difference between controversy and streams of pejorative. There's been far to many instances of the latter for me to really function and maintain a presence on the system.

    I understand that when you talk about certain delicate subjects like racism, sexuality and religion, that there are always going to be griefers and there will always be people that no matter what you say, there will be folks who call you bad names because they think you crossed a line.

    When you talk about the candidates in a presidential race, though, just mentioning the name of one candidate shouldn't brand you a racist or an imbecile, particularly when there are mountains of evidence to the contrary.
  • Craig Eddy · 1 year ago
    You'll be missed. It's a shame they drove you away. I kind of enjoy watching them chase their tails around and not actually presenting a coherent argument. And yet they think they ARE presenting a coherent argument.

    I look forward to telling them all "see, told you so" after a few years should the Big O actually fool enough people into electing him
  • Sprague D · 1 year ago
    I don't often agree with some of your points, but value your contribution as a countervailing force to the knee-jerk hero worship of Obama.

    That said, if you really want to quit FF and remove all your data this is the link: http://friendfeed.com/account/delete

    I hope you don't use it.
  • Phil Glockner · 1 year ago
    Mark,

    Although I often didn't agree with your opinion on FriendFeed, I never had a problem with you stating it. And I valued it too -- it helped me understand different sides of the issues being discussed.

    So, yeah I'll be sad to see you go when all we have in FF is vanilla pudding with a few nuts (nutjobs?) thrown in. Hopefully you will reconsider. Until that time, I'm definitely subscribed here and I'll be looking forward to your articles.
  • Mark Trapp · 1 year ago
    I wrote this on FriendFeed, but since you're not there anymore:

    From my own experience, it does get frustrating to have parts of your interests talked about in a certain way all the time because other people don't have filters. If I share a story about the Pope or the Catholic Church, for example, I'm guaranteed to get comments about how the Catholic Church done someone wrong a thousand years ago or something equally unproductive. I'd like to talk to people, who have gotten over that facile approach to the topic, about the news item, but that never happens. I can see how you've gotten so frustrated with FriendFeed, as you're very much in the minority and the same people keep trying to push their agenda every time one of your topical interests gets shared.

    And I agree with your assessment on a lot of issues: "what I heard a few years ago" seems to trump "here's a reliable source contradicting what you think" almost always. People don't approach topics on FriendFeed with any sort of intellectual curiosity that maybe, somehow, what they believe could possibly be factually incorrect.
  • geechee_girl · 1 year ago
    Not a huge fan of FriendFeed myself. I go because I have friends and colleagues there, but I'd love a better solution for aggregation. Luckily we'll see you around the internet elsewhere though :)
  • daltonsbriefs · 1 year ago
    Mark, come back, don't let the FF bullies tell you that you can't speak freely. Don't let them win.
  • edythe · 1 year ago
    aww, mark. :| i understand all you say, but i surely will miss you over here on friendfeed.
  • Scabr · 1 year ago
    Mark, we need you on FriendFeed.Please,come back.
  • Jess Lee · 1 year ago
    I'm sad to see you go. I rather enjoyed reading your feed. I especially liked that you were different from all the other tech bloggers, including your perspective on politics. I hope to see you come back to FF some day.

    Also, I have to say that 4chan is VERY DIFFERENT from FriendFeed! Trust me, I know. :-)
  • tomhanna · 1 year ago
    I remember going through the same thing with LiveJournal several years ago, which led to starting a blog on my own site. I still have the Livejournal, but now use it for nothing more controversial than sharing recipes and "Twitterfeeds".
  • Robert Safuto · 1 year ago
    The community over on FriendFeed is a very liberal one. At least that is my perception. If people do have conservative views they are not sharing them very much. Probably because they know this is the kind of reaction they will get. People just need to know that If they share something perceived to be negative about Barack Obama then they're likely to get a negative reaction from the crowd over there.
  • Steve Smith · 1 year ago
    boo fucking hoo - take your marbles and go home. Perhaps you are just getting back what you've been giving out for the last 8 years. Karma.
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    You clearly don't know me. Perhaps you wouldn't look so stupid if you stuck
    to commenting stuff you had at least a passing knowledge of.
  • Kevin · 1 year ago
    thank great post, I think this article is useful
  • Moonflash · 11 months ago
    Well after this all blows over, come back to friend feed.
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 11 months ago
    Actually, I'm back now. Thanks!
  • Mark Williams · 11 months ago
    Hey its ....very gossiping.
    Cool ..great going.
  • good penny stocks · 11 months ago
    For those who've not been on FriendFeed, wanna know what it's like? It's like Slashdot, but without the critical thinking. It's like Digg, but with a better vocabulary. It's like 4chan, but without the criminal record. It's like the comments on LittleGreenFootballs during the Rathergate scandal, but without the research.

    Nicely put. For me it's about finding enough time in the day to service the wide ranging social media sites i frequent. I've lurked here a time or two but only started commenting seriously when I signed up with Discus. It's nice to see a platform that seems to work without prejudice.

    As for Friendfeed, hadn't tried that one yet, but will give it a try soon. keep up the commentary :)
  • Anorexia · 10 months ago
    nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-)
    keep it up
  • Viajes Internacionales · 10 months ago
    i luv your blog :), you are on my rss reader now
  • slots · 10 months ago
    Unfortunately, all of the crazies come out in an election year.
  • Chanel wallet · 9 months ago
    I liked the content on this site. Would like to visit again.
    Designer handbags from http://www.dollartree.us
  • hartanto · 9 months ago
    Too bad mate, and sorry to hear that. It`s your decision tough. oh yes, nice to be here
  • Scobleizer · 1 year ago
  • Mark 'Rizzn' Hopkins · 1 year ago
    Wonderful. Chat away. I'm not going to participate, so you guys can go hog wild, misconstrue what I said and talk as much sh!t about me as you like.Based on what I just glimpsed when I looked at the discussion just now, you guys already have a great start on it. Like I said, I'm done.

    It's your fact-free playground now, not mine.